-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OBSDOCS#1324: Improve 'troubleshooting monitoring issues: Investigati… #91118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
dae6181
to
f6679d1
Compare
f6679d1
to
09a9f11
Compare
[source,terminal] | ||
---- | ||
$ oc get namespace ns1 --show-labels | grep 'openshift.io/user-monitoring=false' | ||
---- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @juzhao I came up with this command to check, is there maybe a better option?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
NOTE: default label for user project is openshift.io/user-monitoring=true, but you won't see the label for it if don't set it explicitly.
09a9f11
to
20103d0
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
/label peer-review-needed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few suggestions
modules/monitoring-investigating-why-user-defined-metrics-are-unavailable.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/monitoring-investigating-why-user-defined-metrics-are-unavailable.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/monitoring-investigating-why-user-defined-metrics-are-unavailable.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ng why user-defined project metrics are unavailable'
20103d0
to
727489d
Compare
@eromanova97: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label merge-review-needed |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
@xenolinux: #91118 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@xenolinux: #91118 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.13":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@xenolinux: #91118 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.14":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@xenolinux: #91118 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.15":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@xenolinux: #91118 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.16":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@xenolinux: new pull request created: #91387 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@xenolinux: #91118 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@xenolinux: new pull request created: #91388 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
@xenolinux: new pull request created: #91389 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@eromanova97 Automated CPs failed for 4.12 - 4.16. You need to create manual CPs :( |
Hello @xenolinux done 👍 |
Version(s): 4.12 and later
Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1324
Link to docs preview: https://91118--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html#investigating-why-user-defined-metrics-are-unavailable_troubleshooting-monitoring-issues
QE review:
Additional information: