Skip to content

OBSDOCS#1326: Improve 'troubleshooting monitoring issues, - post OCPBUGS#39126 #91401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2025
Merged

OBSDOCS#1326: Improve 'troubleshooting monitoring issues, - post OCPBUGS#39126 #91401

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor

@eromanova97 eromanova97 commented Apr 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Version(s): 4.16 and later

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1326

Link to docs preview: https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html#investigating-why-user-defined-metrics-are-unavailable_troubleshooting-monitoring-issues

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: this is done separately from #91118 due to the difference in version in which this needs to be applied.

@eromanova97
OBSDOCS-1326: Improve 'troubleshooting monitoring issues: Investigati…
ddc1fc5 
…ng why user-defined project metrics are unavailable' - post OCPBUGS-39126
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 1, 2025
@eromanova97 eromanova97 mentioned this pull request Apr 1, 2025
Merged
1 task
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Tue Apr 01 12:17:46 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/observability/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html
https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/support/troubleshooting/investigating-monitoring-issues.html
https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html
https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/troubleshooting/investigating-monitoring-issues.html
https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa-hcp/latest/observability/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html
https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa-hcp/latest/support/troubleshooting/investigating-monitoring-issues.html
https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/observability/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html
https://91401--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/support/troubleshooting/investigating-monitoring-issues.html

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 1, 2025

@eromanova97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

simonpasquier
simonpasquier reviewed Apr 2, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@simonpasquier simonpasquier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2025
@juzhao
Copy link

juzhao commented Apr 2, 2025

/lgtm

@eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 3, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 3, 2025
xenolinux
xenolinux reviewed Apr 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@xenolinux xenolinux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great

@xenolinux xenolinux added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 3, 2025
@eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Apr 3, 2025
@stevsmit stevsmit added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 3, 2025
@stevsmit stevsmit added this to the Continuous Release milestone Apr 3, 2025
@stevsmit stevsmit removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Apr 3, 2025
@stevsmit
Copy link
Member

stevsmit commented Apr 3, 2025

lgtm

@stevsmit stevsmit merged commit 38f2930 into openshift:main Apr 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@stevsmit
Copy link
Member

stevsmit commented Apr 3, 2025

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.16

@stevsmit
Copy link
Member

stevsmit commented Apr 3, 2025

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.17

@stevsmit
Copy link
Member

stevsmit commented Apr 3, 2025

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.18

@stevsmit
Copy link
Member

stevsmit commented Apr 3, 2025

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@stevsmit: new pull request created: #91572

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@stevsmit: new pull request created: #91573

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@stevsmit: new pull request created: #91574

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@stevsmit: new pull request created: #91575

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2025
Merged
@eromanova97 eromanova97 deleted the OBSDOCS-1326 branch April 4, 2025 06:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@simonpasquier simonpasquier simonpasquier left review comments

@xenolinux xenolinux xenolinux left review comments

Assignees

@simonpasquier simonpasquier

@juzhao juzhao

Labels
branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Continuous Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@eromanova97 @ocpdocs-previewbot @juzhao @stevsmit @openshift-cherrypick-robot @simonpasquier @xenolinux