Skip to content

[release-4.10] Bug 2071941: Replace collect-profile jobs that haven't completed #277

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #255

/assign timflannagan

Problem: The collect-profiles job should only take a few seconds to
run. There are instances, such as when the pod cannot be scheduled,
where the job will not complete in a reasonable amount of time. If
enough jobs are scheduled but unable to run, the number of
scheduled jobs can exceed pod quota limits.

Solution: Given that the collect-profiles job should only take a few
seconds to run and that the job is scheduled to run every 15 minutes,
set the collect-profiles cronJob's spec.concurrencyPolicy to
"Replace" so that only one active collect-profiles pod exists at any
time.
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 5, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Detected clone of Bugzilla bug 2055861 with correct target release. Retitling PR to link to clone:
/retitle [release-4.10] Bug 2071941: Replace collect-profile jobs that haven't completed

In response to this:

[release-4.10] Bug 2055861: Replace collect-profile jobs that haven't completed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.10] Bug 2055861: Replace collect-profile jobs that haven't completed [release-4.10] Bug 2071941: Replace collect-profile jobs that haven't completed Apr 5, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 5, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 5, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2071941, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2055861 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] Bug 2071941: Replace collect-profile jobs that haven't completed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@timflannagan
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle [release-4.10] Bug 2071941: Replace collect-profile jobs that haven't completed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 5, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 5, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, timflannagan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 5, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 6, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2071941, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2055861 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 7, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 7, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2071941, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2055861 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2055861 targets the "4.11.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.11.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Apr 11, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-olm

1 similar comment
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-olm

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-olm

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-olm

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-olm

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 13, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1cb0c9a into openshift:release-4.10 Apr 13, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 13, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2071941 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] Bug 2071941: Replace collect-profile jobs that haven't completed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.9

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@perdasilva: new pull request created: #293

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

tmshort pushed a commit to tmshort/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
Bumps [golang.org/x/text](https://github.com/golang/text) from 0.3.7 to 0.3.8.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/golang/text/releases)
- [Commits](golang/text@v0.3.7...v0.3.8)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: e8bb2e01756424cd3de5ec8521ef370623459cae

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: golang.org/x/text
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
tmshort pushed a commit to tmshort/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
Bumps [golang.org/x/text](https://github.com/golang/text) from 0.3.7 to 0.3.8.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/golang/text/releases)
- [Commits](golang/text@v0.3.7...v0.3.8)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: e8bb2e01756424cd3de5ec8521ef370623459cae

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: golang.org/x/text
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants