Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MCO-1595: MCO-1596: MCO-1597: MCO-1598: Add 4/5 MachineConfigNode e2e tests #29596

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen commented Mar 10, 2025

Notes

  • All tests should run successfully with a cluster built on 4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-03-21-030708 or later with tech preview enabled.
  • The tests for MCO-1597 & MCO-1598 are both tagged Slow, as they often take longer than 5 minutes to run. To have these tests run automatically, we will need to create a suite at a later time (Slack ref), but the tests can still be run locally.

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1596: Validate MCN condition status transitions

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should properly transition through MCN conditions on node update [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1597: Validate MCN condition status on node degrade

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial][Slow]Should properly report MCN conditions on node degrade [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io]"

MCO-1598: Validate MCN on node creation and deletion

Note that this test is skipped for Single Node Openshift

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial][Slow]Should properly create and remove MCN on node creation and deletion [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io]"

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 10, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1520 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dgoodwin for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen changed the title (Work in progress) MCO-1520: Add MachineConfigNode e2e tests (Work in progress) MCO-1595: Add MachineConfigNode e2e tests Mar 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 14, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1595 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 14, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1595 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 14, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1595 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 14, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1595 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

To run, launch a cluster using openshift/machine-config-operator#4876. (Clusterbot: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview)

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 14, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1595 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

To run, launch a cluster using openshift/machine-config-operator#4876: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview) and use the following command.

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 14, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1595 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

To run the tests, launch a cluster using MCO PR 4876.
Clusterbot: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 14, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1595 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

To run the tests, launch a cluster using MCO PR 4876.
Clusterbot example command: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen changed the title (Work in progress) MCO-1595: Add MachineConfigNode e2e tests (Work in progress) MCO-1520: Add MachineConfigNode e2e tests Mar 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 14, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1520 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

To run the tests, launch a cluster using MCO PR 4876.
Clusterbot example command: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen force-pushed the add-mcn-tests branch 2 times, most recently from 379af77 to cca6a6c Compare March 17, 2025 20:13
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 17, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1520 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

To run the test, launch a cluster using MCO PR 4876.
Clusterbot example command: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1596: Validate MCN condition status transitions

This test can be run using any 4.19 cluster with tech preview enabled.

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 17, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1520 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

To run the test, launch a cluster using MCO PR 4876.
Clusterbot example command: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1596: Validate MCN condition status transitions

This test can be run using any 4.19 cluster with tech preview enabled.

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should properly transition through MCN conditions on node update [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen force-pushed the add-mcn-tests branch 3 times, most recently from 32a7289 to e23bc51 Compare March 19, 2025 13:40
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 19, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1520 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

To run the test, launch a cluster using MCO PR 4876.
Clusterbot example command: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1596: Validate MCN condition status transitions

This test can be run using any 4.19 cluster with tech preview enabled.

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should properly transition through MCN conditions on node update [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1597: Validate MCN condition status on node degrade

This test can be run using any 4.19 cluster with tech preview enabled.

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should properly report MCN conditions on node degrade [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 21, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1520 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

MCO-1595: Validate MCN properties

To run the test, launch a cluster using MCO PR 4876.
Clusterbot example command: launch 4.19,openshift/machine-config-operator#4876 aws,techpreview

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1596: Validate MCN condition status transitions

This test can be run using any 4.19 cluster with tech preview enabled.

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should properly transition through MCN conditions on node update [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1597: Validate MCN condition status on node degrade

This test can be run using any 4.19 cluster with tech preview enabled.

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should properly report MCN conditions on node degrade [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

MCO-1598: Validate MCN on node creation and deletion

./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNode][Serial] Should properly create and remove MCN on node creation and deletion [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 28, 2025
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Mar 28, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: afd3335

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback MissingData
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (104) are below the historical average (2455): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-okd-e2e-gcp IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (15) are below the historical average (79): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Mar 28, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: afd3335

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (93) are below the historical average (248): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (104) are below the historical average (2455): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-okd-e2e-gcp IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (15) are below the historical average (79): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: da4e47b

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback MissingData
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling Medium
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-etcd should not exit an excessive amount of times
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdMembersDown should not be at or above info
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-disruptive Medium
[bz-Etcd] clusteroperator/etcd should not change condition/Available
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-node] static pods should start after being created
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-okd-e2e-gcp IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (17) are below the historical average (78): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: da4e47b

Job Name New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial High - "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should properly transition through MCN conditions on node update [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" is a new test that failed 1 time(s) against the current commit

New tests seen in this PR at sha: da4e47b

  • "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" [Total: 2, Pass: 2, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should properly transition through MCN conditions on node update [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" [Total: 2, Pass: 1, Fail: 1, Flake: 0]

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9519f3c

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback MissingData
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling Medium
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-multus should not exit an excessive amount of times
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.19 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-disruptive Medium
[bz-Etcd] clusteroperator/etcd should not change condition/Available
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-node] static pods should start after being created
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically for ns/openshift-kube-apiserver-operator
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-node] node-lifecycle detects unexpected not ready node
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling High
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-etcd should not exit an excessive amount of times
This test has passed 99.94% of 6438 runs on release 4.19 [Overall] in the last week.
---
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdMembersDown should not be at or above info
This test has passed 99.88% of 6434 runs on release 4.19 [Overall] in the last week.

1 similar comment
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9519f3c

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback MissingData
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling Medium
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-multus should not exit an excessive amount of times
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.19 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-disruptive Medium
[bz-Etcd] clusteroperator/etcd should not change condition/Available
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-node] static pods should start after being created
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically for ns/openshift-kube-apiserver-operator
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-node] node-lifecycle detects unexpected not ready node
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling High
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-etcd should not exit an excessive amount of times
This test has passed 99.94% of 6438 runs on release 4.19 [Overall] in the last week.
---
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdMembersDown should not be at or above info
This test has passed 99.88% of 6434 runs on release 4.19 [Overall] in the last week.

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 2, 2025

@isabella-janssen: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling 9519f3c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 9519f3c link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn 9519f3c link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn 9519f3c link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive 9519f3c link false /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling 9519f3c link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling 9519f3c link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/okd-e2e-gcp 9519f3c link false /test okd-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview 9519f3c link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi 9519f3c link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/e2e-aws 9519f3c link false /test e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 9519f3c link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-serial 9519f3c link false /test e2e-openstack-serial
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling 9519f3c link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial 9519f3c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout 9519f3c link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6 9519f3c link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 9519f3c link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial 9519f3c link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial
ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback 9519f3c link false /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial 9519f3c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial 9519f3c link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9519f3c

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (85) are below the historical average (237): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling Medium
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-multus should not exit an excessive amount of times
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial High
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.19 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-disruptive Medium
[bz-Etcd] clusteroperator/etcd should not change condition/Available
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-node] static pods should start after being created
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically for ns/openshift-kube-apiserver-operator
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-node] node-lifecycle detects unexpected not ready node
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling High
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-etcd should not exit an excessive amount of times
This test has passed 99.94% of 6380 runs on release 4.19 [Overall] in the last week.
---
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdMembersDown should not be at or above info
This test has passed 99.87% of 6376 runs on release 4.19 [Overall] in the last week.

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: 9519f3c

Job Name New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial High - "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" is a new test, was only seen in one job, and failed 1 time(s) against the current commit.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial High - "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should properly transition through MCN conditions on node update [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" is a new test, was only seen in one job, and failed 1 time(s) against the current commit.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial Medium - "[sig-trt] Skipped annotations present" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: 9519f3c

  • "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should have MCN properties matching associated node properties [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" [Total: 1, Pass: 0, Fail: 1, Flake: 0]
  • "[sig-mco][OCPFeatureGate:MachineConfigNodes] [Serial]Should properly transition through MCN conditions on node update [apigroup:machineconfiguration.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" [Total: 1, Pass: 0, Fail: 1, Flake: 0]
  • "[sig-trt] Skipped annotations present" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 1]

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor

djoshy commented Apr 2, 2025

/payload-job ?

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 2, 2025

@djoshy: it appears that you have attempted to use some version of the payload command, but your comment was incorrectly formatted and cannot be acted upon. See the docs for usage info.

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor

djoshy commented Apr 2, 2025

/payload-job help

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 2, 2025

@djoshy: trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor

djoshy commented Apr 2, 2025

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 2, 2025

@djoshy: trigger 4 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c95e2290-0ff1-11f0-97bd-ba68be73eb1a-0

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 2, 2025

@isabella-janssen: trigger 4 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/ff848910-101c-11f0-9c6c-ccb796a017c3-0

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 62e3d28

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback MissingData
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling Medium
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-multus should not exit an excessive amount of times
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (1319): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 62e3d28

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling Medium
[sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-multus should not exit an excessive amount of times
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (1319): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants