Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-8993: add namespace label to InstallPlanStepAppliedWithWarnings #3012

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the change:

This change updates the expression of InstallPlanStepAppliedWithWarnings to aggregate the result by namespace.

Motivation for the change:

The alerting consistency guide [1] requires the following:

Alerts SHOULD include a namespace label indicating the alert's source.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/monitoring/alerting-consistency.md

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-low Referenced Jira bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8993, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to target the "4.14.0" version, but no target version was set
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Closed (Won't Do) instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Description of the change:

This change updates the expression of InstallPlanStepAppliedWithWarnings to aggregate the result by namespace.

Motivation for the change:

The alerting consistency guide [1] requires the following:

Alerts SHOULD include a namespace label indicating the alert's source.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/monitoring/alerting-consistency.md

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2023

Hi @simonpasquier. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a operator-framework member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dinhxuanvu and tmshort August 17, 2023 09:38
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8993, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kuiwang02

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from kuiwang02 August 17, 2023 09:39
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2023

@simonpasquier: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/ok-to-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor Author

/close
I'll open it against https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/ instead.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Aug 21, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 21, 2023

@simonpasquier: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close
I'll open it against https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/ instead.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8993. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

Description of the change:

This change updates the expression of InstallPlanStepAppliedWithWarnings to aggregate the result by namespace.

Motivation for the change:

The alerting consistency guide [1] requires the following:

Alerts SHOULD include a namespace label indicating the alert's source.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/monitoring/alerting-consistency.md

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor Author

/reopen

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot reopened this Aug 21, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 21, 2023

@simonpasquier: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8993, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kuiwang02

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Description of the change:

This change updates the expression of InstallPlanStepAppliedWithWarnings to aggregate the result by namespace.

Motivation for the change:

The alerting consistency guide [1] requires the following:

Alerts SHOULD include a namespace label indicating the alert's source.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/monitoring/alerting-consistency.md

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dinhxuanvu
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 21, 2023
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Aug 21, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2023
Copy link
Member

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 21, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dinhxuanvu, simonpasquier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 21, 2023
The alerting consistency guide [1] requires the following:

`Alerts SHOULD include a namespace label indicating the alert's source.`

This change updates the expression of InstallPlanStepAppliedWithWarnings
to aggregate the result by namespace.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/monitoring/alerting-consistency.md

Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 23, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 23, 2023

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Collaborator

triggering rebase from this side to get this through

@perdasilva
Copy link
Collaborator

merging as CI is green and we have both approval and lgtm

@perdasilva perdasilva merged commit 2976198 into operator-framework:master Aug 23, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonpasquier: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8993: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-8993 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Description of the change:

This change updates the expression of InstallPlanStepAppliedWithWarnings to aggregate the result by namespace.

Motivation for the change:

The alerting consistency guide [1] requires the following:

Alerts SHOULD include a namespace label indicating the alert's source.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/monitoring/alerting-consistency.md

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@simonpasquier simonpasquier deleted the OCPBUGS-8993 branch August 23, 2023 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-low Referenced Jira bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants