Skip to content

REF: split out dtype-finding in concat_compat #53260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 22, 2023

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

Split off from #52532

@mroeschke mroeschke added the Refactor Internal refactoring of code label May 16, 2023
Copy link
Member

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

generally looks good - have left some minor comments, but I'm not really familiar-enough with a lot of what's being used here to be able to merge

"""
from pandas.core.construction import ensure_wrapped_if_datetimelike

to_concat = [ensure_wrapped_if_datetimelike(x) for x in to_concat]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also, could you explain why ensure_wrapped_if_datetimelike and atleast_2d are no longer needed here?

in general, for anything non-trivial, I'd really appreciate a comment explaining why you're making changes, else reviews can really take hours

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the not single_dtype case is irrelevant bc in that case we find_common_dtype and cast to it. The ensure_wrapped_if_datetimelike is unnecessary bc caller is responsible for ensuring we are wrapped where appropriate. The axis is unnecessary bc the axis=1 cases all go through the lib.dtypes_all_equal path at the top of concat_compat

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The axis is unnecessary bc the axis=1 cases all go through the lib.dtypes_all_equal path at the top of concat_compat

Not sure I follow, sorry - in test_append_new_columns, it reaches concat_compat with axis=1 but it doesn't go through the # fastpath! path at the top of concat_compat

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test_append_new_columns doesnt have any datetime columns, so wouldn't go through _concat_datetime. Should have been clearer thats what i was referring to.

Copy link
Member

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine, no objections to you merging if you're confident about this

@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.1 milestone May 22, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit 2f49f73 into pandas-dev:main May 22, 2023
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @jbrockmendel

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the ref-concat-compcat branch May 22, 2023 18:20
topper-123 pushed a commit to topper-123/pandas that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
* REF: split out dtype-finding in concat_compat

* mypy fixup

* fix annotation

* remove unused ignore
Daquisu pushed a commit to Daquisu/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2023
* REF: split out dtype-finding in concat_compat

* mypy fixup

* fix annotation

* remove unused ignore
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Refactor Internal refactoring of code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants