BUG: Fix #59429 stacked bar label position #60211
Conversation
rhshadrach
changed the title
| @@ -774,6 +774,15 @@ def test_bar_nan_stacked(self): | |||
| expected = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 10.0, 0.0, 20.0, 15.0, 10.0, 40.0] | |||
| assert result == expected | |||
|
|
|||
| def test_bar_stacked_label_position_with_zero_height(self): | |||
| df = DataFrame({"A": [3, 0, 1], "B": [0, 2, 4], "C": [5, 0, 2]}) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you start this test with a comment referencing the GH issue. E.g. see the test immediately below for an example.
doc/source/whatsnew/v2.3.0.rst
Outdated
| @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ Period | |||
|
|
|||
| Plotting | |||
| ^^^^^^^^ | |||
| - | |||
| - Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.plot.bar` with ``stacked=True`` where labels on stacked bars with zero-height segments were incorrectly positioned at the base instead of the label position of the previous segment (:issue:`59429`) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This note should be move to v3.0.0.rst.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2.3.0 is a "special" release in that we are not doing it from the main branch. We are only backporting certain PRs to the 2.3.x branch.
…tacked-bar-label-position
…d issue tracking number to test as requested
|
Thank you! I made the requested changes and synced the branch. This is ready for re-review after the checks complete. |
|
Thanks @tev-dixon! |
doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rstfile if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.