Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP: Multiple y-axis formatting #6320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Multiple y-axis formatting #6320
Changes from all commits
f013426
7e45c3b
68b8f8f
4194097
23efbe8
736db9d
e5f5e4c
06d1daf
78c51ca
4194f8f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ax._anchorAxis
contains several other keys and values that may be of interest for other functions.Wondering it might be better to use
Lib.extendFlat
e.g.or alternatively mutate
ax._anchorAxis
directly i.e.?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I ran into difficulties with the latter in that this function is called multiple times during the axis drawing so the offset value ends up as double what it should be.
Could you clarify the issue with the modification here? I'm not totally understanding as this seems to be following the same pattern as was already implemented eg. in lines 3809-3817 below.