Skip to content

Upgrade from AppWrapper v1beta1 to v1beta2 #484

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

dgrove-oss
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue link

What changes have been made

Context: This PR supports the migration of the codeflare operator from MCADv1 to Kueue+AppWrapper. We should probably wait on merging this PR until the corresponding PRs on the consuming codeflare repos are ready, as the removal of MCADv1 CRDs is a breaking change.

Depends on: project-codeflare/codeflare-common#37

Verification steps

I have verified that unit tests are running locally.

I expect end-to-end tests will fail because there is a circular dependency between updates to the SDK and updates to the codeflare operator (the e2e tests for this repo install the codeflare operator, which can't be updated until the SDK is updated).

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • [ x ] Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • Testing is not required for this change

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 18, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign fiona-waters for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dgrove-oss
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This PR is now ready for review.

Copy link
Collaborator

@KPostOffice KPostOffice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @dgrove-oss . A few comments

@@ -64,11 +64,12 @@ jobs:
with:
repository: project-codeflare/codeflare-operator
path: codeflare-operator
ref: mcadv1b2
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this stay mcadv1b2 or is this only because the CFO PR isn't merged yet?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is only because the CFO PR isn't merged. Once we merge all the pieces, this goes back to pulling from main.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 28, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 1, 2024
@dgrove-oss dgrove-oss mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
4 tasks
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 4, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dgrove-oss
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing as outdated.

@dgrove-oss dgrove-oss closed this Apr 16, 2024
@dgrove-oss dgrove-oss deleted the mcadv1b2 branch April 16, 2024 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants