Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] gh-132166: Add check in find_longest_match for checking if sequences are identical #132167

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jurgenwigg
Copy link

@jurgenwigg jurgenwigg commented Apr 6, 2025

As mentioned in #132166 added checking if both sequences are identical at the beginning of the method find_longest_match in SequenceMatcher class.

@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented Apr 6, 2025

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

Copy link
Member

@sobolevn sobolevn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, see my question in #132166 (comment)

Comment on lines +4 to +5
It appears to fix issue when comparing two slightly different strings ends up
with waiting forever for the result.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
It appears to fix issue when comparing two slightly different strings ends up
with waiting forever for the result.
It appears to fix issue when comparing two slightly different strings ends up
with waiting forever for the result.

We should be more confident here. Does it fix the issue or not? if so, let's say it. Otherwise, let's not give tentative conclusions.

Comment on lines +1 to +3
Add checking if sequences ``a[alo:ahi]`` and ``b[blo:bhi]`` are the same on the
beginning of the method find_longest_match in SequenceMatcher. For identical
sequences there is no reason to run whole logic when simple check can be done.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This NEWS should be summarized. I suggest something like (assumiong that the method is documented, if not use a plain

Add a fast path in :meth:`SequenceMatcher.find_longest_match
<difflib.SequenceMatcher.find_longest_match>` to handle the
case when ``a[alo:ahi] == b[blo:bhi]``.


# Check if both sequences are the same before executing rest of the
# method.
if a[alo:ahi] == b[blo:bhi]:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this covered in tests? if not, please add a test, otherwise no need to add a large one.

@jurgenwigg jurgenwigg changed the title gh-132166: Add check in find_longest_match for checking if sequences are identical [WIP] gh-132166: Add check in find_longest_match for checking if sequences are identical Apr 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants