Skip to content

[3.10] bpo-40321: Support HTTP response status code 308 in urllib.request (GH-19588) #28750

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Oct 6, 2021

  • Support HTTP response status code 308 in urllib.

HTTP response status code 308 is defined in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7538 to be the permanent redirect variant of 307 (temporary redirect).

  • Update documentation to include http_error_308()

  • Add blurb for bpo-40321 fix

Co-authored-by: Roland Crosby [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit c379bc5)

Co-authored-by: Jochem Schulenklopper [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue40321

…ythonGH-19588)

* Support HTTP response status code 308 in urllib.

HTTP response status code 308 is defined in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7538 to be the permanent redirect variant of 307 (temporary redirect).

* Update documentation to include http_error_308()

* Add blurb for bpo-40321 fix

Co-authored-by: Roland Crosby <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c379bc5)

Co-authored-by: Jochem Schulenklopper <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jschulenklopper and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jschulenklopper and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jschulenklopper and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jschulenklopper and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@ambv ambv closed this Oct 6, 2021
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-c379bc5-3.10 branch October 6, 2021 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants