Skip to content

refactor: test frameworks via matrix #211

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 5, 2024

Conversation

marcusschiesser
Copy link
Collaborator

@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser commented Aug 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced CI/CD pipeline with support for multiple frameworks: nextjs, express, and fastapi, improving the flexibility of testing and deployment processes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved test suite structure and logic for creating Llama applications, ensuring better maintainability and clarity without compromising functionality.
  • Chores

    • Updated environment configurations to streamline framework-specific testing.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 5, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 2e358ce

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the CI/CD pipeline by updating the GitHub Actions workflow to include a matrix strategy for testing across multiple frameworks: Next.js, Express, and FastAPI. Additionally, the test suite for creating a Llama application has been refined for greater clarity and maintainability, focusing on a single template type while dynamically adapting to specified frameworks. These improvements significantly boost the flexibility and robustness of the testing process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/e2e.yml Added matrix configuration for frameworks (Next.js, Express, FastAPI) and set FRAMEWORK environment variable.
e2e/basic.spec.ts Simplified test structure by using a fixed template type and dynamically configuring framework tests. Restructured loops for clarity without changing core test functionality.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where the test scripts play,
New frameworks hop in, brightening the day!
With a twitch of the nose, the workflows align,
Creating Llama apps, oh how they shine!
Let's celebrate changes, both big and small,
For our CI/CD now stands proud and tall! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e974c8e and fbe3b08.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/e2e.yml (2 hunks)
  • e2e/basic.spec.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
.github/workflows/e2e.yml (2)

21-21: Approved: Addition of frameworks to the matrix configuration.

This change enhances the flexibility of the CI/CD pipeline by allowing the job to run for each specified framework.


67-67: Approved: Setting FRAMEWORKS environment variable.

This change ensures that the selected framework is accessible within the job's environment, facilitating framework-specific configurations.

e2e/basic.spec.ts (8)

14-14: Approved: Setting templateType to a fixed value.

This change simplifies the control flow by eliminating the outer loop that previously iterated over multiple template types.


15-17: Approved: Dynamic configuration of templateFrameworks.

This change enhances flexibility in testing different frameworks without altering the code.


28-31: Approved: Restructuring of loops.

This change reflects the removal of the templateType loop, streamlining the test execution path.


38-67: Approved: Test description and initialization updates.

The changes ensure that the tests are correctly described and initialized within the new loop structure.


69-72: Approved: Test case for checking the existence of the app folder.

The test case remains functional and ensures that the app folder exists.


73-77: Approved: Test case for verifying the frontend title.

The test case remains functional and ensures that the frontend has a title.


79-101: Approved: Test case for submitting a message and receiving a response.

The test case remains functional and ensures that the frontend can submit a message and receive a response.


103-124: Approved: Test case for backend frameworks response.

The test case remains functional and ensures that the backend frameworks respond correctly.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fbe3b08 and 2e358ce.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/e2e.yml (2 hunks)
  • e2e/basic.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/e2e.yml
Additional comments not posted (8)
e2e/basic.spec.ts (8)

14-22: LGTM!

The initialization of variables for templateType, templateFramework, dataSource, templateUI, and templatePostInstallAction is clear and correctly handles environment variables.


27-29: LGTM!

The initialization of additional variables for llamaCloudProjectName, llamaCloudIndexName, appType, and userMessage is clear and correctly handles conditional logic.


30-30: LGTM!

The test suite description is clear and correctly uses the initialized variables.


39-59: LGTM!

The test environment setup in the beforeAll hook is correct and initializes all necessary variables.


61-64: LGTM!

The test correctly checks for the existence of the app folder.


65-69: LGTM!

The test correctly checks for the frontend title and handles the templatePostInstallAction condition.


71-91: LGTM!

The test correctly handles message submission and checks the response from the frontend.


93-114: LGTM!

The test correctly handles the backend API response and skips the test for nextjs.

@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser merged commit e7d30b1 into main Aug 5, 2024
37 checks passed
@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser deleted the ms/use-test-matrix-for-speedup branch August 5, 2024 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant