Rollup of 3 pull requests

[fee1-dead]

Successful merges:

• Clarify behavior of inclusive bounds in BTreeMap::{lower,upper}_bound #112151 (Clarify behavior of inclusive bounds in BTreeMap::{lower,upper}_bound)
• Updated lines doc to include trailing carriage return note #113512 (Updated lines doc to include trailing carriage return note)
• Effects: don't print host param in diagnostics #114203 (Effects: don't print host param in diagnostics)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[fee1-dead]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

[bors]

📌 Commit 7b4bfd6 has been approved by fee1-dead

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 7b4bfd6 with merge 4c9ac1e...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: fee1-dead
Pushing 4c9ac1e to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#112151	Clarify behavior of inclusive bounds in BTreeMap::{lower,up…	b612866229ecea4bda7623192172710c3070f33a (link)
#113512	Updated lines doc to include trailing carriage return note	3db653baf8ed7e17c1bc26b0cd95ff24ed0fc088 (link)
#114203	Effects: don't print host param in diagnostics	c7efbf35d04c3a274fc9f771c31b54cf88b8c72c (link)

previous master: 2e0136a131

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4c9ac1e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.1%	[1.0%, 1.1%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.3%	[0.6%, 2.8%]	14
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.6%	[3.6%, 3.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.3%	[0.6%, 2.8%]	14

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.3%	[4.2%, 7.3%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 651.209s -> 651.392s (0.03%)