Skip to content

[test] Add test cases for untested functions for VecDeque #96107

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

[test] Add test cases for untested functions for VecDeque #96107

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2022

Conversation

Gumichocopengin8
Copy link
Contributor

Added test cases of the following functions

  • get
  • get_mut
  • swap
  • reserve_exact
  • try_reserve_exact
  • try_reserve
  • contains
  • rotate_left
  • rotate_right
  • binary_search
  • binary_search_by
  • binary_search_by_key

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 16, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with r? rust-lang/libs-api @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to request review from a libs-api team reviewer. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 16, 2022
@Gumichocopengin8
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think Mark is busy.
r? @m-ou-se could you review this PR?

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

I should be able to go through my review queue this weekend.

@Gumichocopengin8
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mark-Simulacrum Thanks!

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@rustbot author

Use @rustbot review to put this back in my review queue.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 16, 2022
@Gumichocopengin8
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot review

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 17, 2022
@Gumichocopengin8
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mark-Simulacrum Could you please review this?

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r=me with commits squashed -- I don't think we need a separate commit per function being tested.

For the future, once things are in the review queue (S-waiting-on-review), there's generally no benefit to pinging, and it does add noise to everyone's inboxes and such -- all of our reviewers are generally pretty busy and we have a dedicated group of folks helping with triage who will poke if things seem to not be moving along. Review latency of ~7 days is not unusual, unfortunately.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 24, 2022
@Gumichocopengin8
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for letting me know and sorry for disturbing several times. I'll be patient.

@Gumichocopengin8
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot review
Squashed commits to 1 commit

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

No worries!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 24, 2022

📌 Commit a40cd2a has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 24, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#96369 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-q18w4v2, r=matthi…
1f631e8 
…askrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95395 (Better error message for `_` in function signature in `impl Trait for Ty`)
 - rust-lang#96090 (Implement MIR opt unit tests)
 - rust-lang#96107 ([test] Add test cases for untested functions for VecDeque)
 - rust-lang#96212 (Use revisions instead of nll compare mode for `/regions/` ui tests)
 - rust-lang#96215 (Drop support for legacy PM with LLVM 15)
 - rust-lang#96366 (bootstrap: Remove dead code in rustdoc shim)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b7e67a6 into rust-lang:master Apr 25, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 25, 2022
@Gumichocopengin8 Gumichocopengin8 deleted the test/vec-deque branch April 25, 2022 00:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum Awaiting requested review from Mark-Simulacrum

Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.62.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@Gumichocopengin8 @rust-highfive @Mark-Simulacrum @bors @m-ou-se @rustbot