-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
test: Add tests for file_header and footer #533
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+38
−3
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4d82cb4
Adding tests for file_header and footer
Maleware ec9511b
Merge branch 'main' into fix/file-header-footer-tests
Maleware 0d25aeb
Adding test step to check if var ROLE_HEADER_VAR is gone
Maleware ca1e726
Reworking tests for more readability and better codes style
Maleware 253f467
Adding new line
Maleware File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's my suggestion:
--arg
options).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the suggestion, it makes sense to me. However, we implemented such stuff here e.g. https://github.com/stackabletech/airflow-operator/pull/490/files and from myself https://github.com/stackabletech/airflow-operator/pull/493/files
As I said I like your suggestion, but fear our tests differ to much from one another and nobody is going to understand it anymore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see how it has been done, but to me they are unreadable. I think we should go with the readable option (it lessens the burden on reviewers too).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First off: I don't have a strong opinion, but I would tend to agree with @NickLarsenNZ. I see your concerns @Maleware and I have the same ones (mono-repo would be much easier here), but I personally think readability is more important in this case (especially as @NickLarsenNZ already did the work of rewriting the script)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Granted: ca1e726