We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Their signatures are: linalg.vecdot(x1, x2, /, *, axis=None)
linalg.vecdot(x1, x2, /, *, axis=None)
vecdot(x1, x2, /, *, axis=-1)
I'd certainly prefer to settle for axis=-1.
axis=-1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ouch, that seems like a bug to me, good catch @lezcano.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I think this was just an oversight #281
This has been addressed in #358.
fix: address default value regression for axis kwarg in vecdot
axis
vecdot
d610848
Closes: data-apis#804 Ref: data-apis#355 Ref: data-apis#358 Ref: data-apis@cbbab62
fd6f507
PR-URL: #880 Closes: #804 Ref: #355 Ref: #358 Ref: cbbab62
kgryte
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Their signatures are:
linalg.vecdot(x1, x2, /, *, axis=None)
vecdot(x1, x2, /, *, axis=-1)
I'd certainly prefer to settle for
axis=-1
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: