-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
FilterPathBasedFilter support match fieldname with dot #83178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FilterPathBasedFilter support match fieldname with dot #83178
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra (Team:Core/Infra) |
@elasticmachine, test this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you've added two bits of my other PR that you should remove. I commented on the files. I think they are the right thing to change, but I want to get them reviewed by other folks. But I can review the xcontent change. I think it fine - though I'd prefer a non-recursive solution. I added a couple other test cases, one that blows up in a recursive solution.
I see now what you are doing with prefix matching - it's for if the pattern fully matches. That makes sense to me. I added some more test cases to the abstract filtering test case thingy for that too.
server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/routing/IndexRouting.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/routing/IndexRoutingTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@nik9000 I've rollback the changes you comment and add some tests for double wildcard in |
@elasticmachine, test this please |
Thanks for your changes so far! I think one of the tests is still going to fail because the solution is recursive, but otherwise I'm happy with it. Could you try running |
I talked with @mushao999 about the recursion here. He mentioned that the test that I added actually stack overflows on other code! Ooops. But he's going to zap his recursion to make me happy. I'm thankful for that. |
@elasticmachine, test this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For now we're going to let the recursion live. We both want to zap it, but don't have any good ideas at the moment.
* upstream/master: (100 commits) Avoid duplicate _type fields in v7 compat layer (elastic#83239) Bump bundled JDK to 17.0.2+8 (elastic#83243) [DOCS] Correct header syntax (elastic#83275) Add unit tests for indices.recovery.max_bytes_per_sec default values (elastic#83261) [DOCS] Add note that write indices are not replicated (elastic#82997) Add notes on indexing to kNN search guide (elastic#83188) Fix get-snapshot-api :docs:integTest (elastic#83273) FilterPathBasedFilter support match fieldname with dot (elastic#83178) Fix compilation issues in example-plugins (elastic#83258) fix ClusterStateListener javadoc (elastic#83246) Speed up Building Indices Lookup in Metadata (elastic#83241) Mute whole suite for elastic#82502 (elastic#83252) Make PeerFinder log messages happier (elastic#83222) [Docs] Add supported _terms_enum field types (elastic#83244) Add an aggregator for IPv4 and IPv6 subnets (elastic#82410) [CI] Fix 70_time_series/default sort yaml test failures (elastic#83217) Update test-failure Issue Template to include "needs:triage" label elastic#83226 Add an index->step cache to the PolicyStepsRegistry (elastic#82316) Improve support for joda datetime to java datetime transition in Painless (elastic#83099) Fix joda migration for week based methods in Painless (elastic#83232) ... # Conflicts: # x-pack/plugin/rollup/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/rollup/v2/TransportRollupAction.java
Current
FilterPathBasedFilter
does not support match fieldName with dot.This PR merges the changes of #83148 and #83152 together to add the ability of
matching fieldName with dot
to theFilterPathBasedFilter
.