-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Add typing to basic_checker
#6769
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2413958046
π - Coveralls |
π€ Effect of this PR on checked open source code: π€ Effect on pandas:
The following messages are now emitted:
The following messages are no longer emitted:
|
Is the primer broken because we're on bleeding edge astroid ? I feel like it should be said somewhere if that's the case. Also we probably want to provide the crash template file instead of the pylint message ? |
@jacobtylerwalls Another
I don't think we can easily extract the crash template from the environment. Perhaps we can redirect |
It was fixed in the Astroid PR we merged this morning. The job did not fail, just extraneous comments. It's the "race condition" of one unlucky contributor pushing right after an Astroid change involving a crash and right before a pylint push to main. We are testing an incredible amount of code against astroid now with the primer, I don't expect this a lot! |
All of it in the log, including a GitHub Actions warning to point folks directly to it. We did a lot of work around this :D I agree it could still surprise a contributor. I'm realizing it's not just |
I think we discussed this with @DanielNoord when we added the original primer, there's a system in place for caching based on a concatenation of all repo hashes. |
@jacobtylerwalls I think I found the issue. It's a funny one (for us developers that is...) It can't be the external project pushing a commit. Luckily I though of that, which is why only the However, notice which run this PR chose to use: That's a run of 13 hours ago based on this commit: ceab9aa Why are we using such on old commit while there were more recent commits? https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/commits/main > 9935d49 Because I'm dumb and ignore any changes to TLDR: Let's run |
That is some back-of-the-labtop-worthy quote. (Also, great analysis π ) |
I was the one that asked for this, sorry! π§ |
Oh really? Oh well, then I should have though about the impact better π I'm very happy I decided to develop this on |
Type of Changes
Description