-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 537
Xnnpack test for program-data separation #10532
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: gh/lucylq/72/base
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Add xnnpack test for program-data separation Differential Revision: [D73794695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73794695/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10532
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 2 New Failures, 4 Cancelled JobsAs of commit 2d4bfd7 with merge base 6932baf ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
CANCELLED JOBS - The following jobs were cancelled. Please retry:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Add xnnpack test for program-data separation Differential Revision: [D73794695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73794695/) ghstack-source-id: 280729186 Pull Request resolved: #10532
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73794695 |
# Uses an fbcode target path because the authoring/export tools | ||
# intentionally don't work in xplat (since they're host-only | ||
# tools). | ||
"ET_MODULE_LINEAR_XNN_PROGRAM_PATH": "$(location fbcode//executorch/test/models:exported_xnnpack_program_and_data[ModuleLinear-e.pte])", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can this be an e2e test? instead of this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmn, could you expand a bit more? It should test the E2E
Add xnnpack test for program-data separation Differential Revision: [D73794695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73794695/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #10532 Add xnnpack test for program-data separation ghstack-source-id: 282132816 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73794695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73794695/)
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73794695 |
Add xnnpack test for program-data separation Differential Revision: [D73794695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73794695/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #10532 Add xnnpack test for program-data separation ghstack-source-id: 282463590 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73794695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73794695/)
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73794695 |
Add xnnpack test for program-data separation Differential Revision: [D73794695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73794695/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #10532 Add xnnpack test for program-data separation ghstack-source-id: 282559966 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73794695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73794695/)
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73794695 |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Add xnnpack test for program-data separation
Differential Revision: D73794695